ABSTRACT
More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country's first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute's headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus' RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion's transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan.
ABSTRACT
Aims: This work aimed to review patients discharged from Spanish hospitals with a principal diagnosis of infection during a 5-year period, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Materials and method: This work analyzed the Basic Minimum Data Set (CMBD) of patients discharged during the 2016-2020 period from hospitals in the Spanish National Health Service in order to identify cases with a principal diagnosis of an infectious disease according to the ICD-10-S code. All patients older than 14 years of age admitted to a conventional ward or intensive care unit, excluding labor and delivery, were included in the analysis and were evaluated based on the discharging department. Results: Patients discharged with infectious diseases as the principal diagnosis have increased from 10% to 19% in recent years. A large part of the growth is due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Internal medicine departments cared for more than 50% of these patients, followed by pulmonology (9%) and surgery (5%). In 2020, 57% of patients with a principal diagnosis of infection were discharged by internists, who cared for 67% of patients with SARS CoV-2. Conclusions: At present, more than half of patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of infection are discharged from internal medicine departments. Given the growing complexity of infections, the authors advocate for an approach in which training allows for specialization, but within a generalist context, for the better management of these patients.
ABSTRACT
More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country's first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute's headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus' RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion's transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan.
ABSTRACT
More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country's first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute's headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus' RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion's transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chiroptera , Animals , China/epidemiology , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
AIMS: This work aimed to review patients discharged from Spanish hospitals with a principal diagnosis of infection during a 5-year period, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This work analyzed the Basic Minimum Data Set (CMBD) of patients discharged during the 2016â¬2020 period from hospitals in the Spanish National Health Service in order to identify cases with a principal diagnosis of an infectious disease according to the ICD-10-S code. All patients older than 14 years of age admitted to a conventional ward or intensive care unit, excluding labor and delivery, were included in the analysis and were evaluated based on the discharging department. RESULTS: Patients discharged with infectious diseases as the principal diagnosis have increased from 10% to 19% in recent years. A large part of the growth is due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Internal medicine departments cared for more than 50% of these patients, followed by pulmonology (9%) and surgery (5%). In 2020, 57% of patients with a principal diagnosis of infection were discharged by internists, who cared for 67% of patients with SARS CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: At present, more than half of patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of infection are discharged from internal medicine departments. Given the growing complexity of infections, the authors advocate for an approach in which training allows for specialization, but within a generalist context, for the better management of these patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , State Medicine , HospitalsSubject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumocystis carinii/isolation & purification , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Symptom Assessment/methods , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for medical and public health reasons, to allow the best treatment of cases and the best control of the pandemic. Serology testing allows for the detection of asymptomatic infections and 19-COVID cases once the virus has been cleared. We analyzed the usefulness of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid test of Autobio and tried to correlate its pattern with the severity of COVID19 infection. METHODS: We analyzed the accuracy and clinical usefulness of a point-of-care IgM and/or IgG test for SARS-CoV-2 in 35 COVID-19 patients [12 (34.3%) mild-moderate and 23 (65.7%) severe-critical] admitted to a field hospital in Madrid, as well as in 5 controls. RESULTS: The mean time from the first day of symptoms to the antibody test was 28 days (SD: 8.7), similar according to the severity of the disease. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR+ showed the corresponding IgG positivity, while these results were negative in all control individuals. A total of 26 (74%) cases also presented with positive IgM, 19 (83%) were severe-critical cases and 7 (58%) were mild-moderate cases. The IgM response lasted longer in the severe critical cases (mean: 29.7 days; SD: 8.4) compared to the moderate cases (mean: 21.2 days; SD: 2.0).. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid serology tests are useful for the diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 (mainly IgG detection) and may also be correlated with the severity of the infection (based on IgM detection).